📘 What’s Inside This CAT RC Practice Post?

📝 Authentic CAT Reading Comprehension Passage: Practice with a real RC passage from a previous CAT exam.
✅ Detailed Questions with Step-by-Step Solutions: Each question is explained thoroughly for better understanding.
🔍 In-Depth Passage Analysis: Gain insights through line-by-line and paragraph-wise analysis, supplemented with a quick summary table for efficient revision.
📚 Vocabulary Enhancement: Get a separate post explaining all tough words from the passage.



RC Passage

Direction for the questions 13 to 16: The passage below is accompanied by a set of four questions. Choose the best answer to each question.

The biggest challenge [The Nutmeg's Curse by Ghosh] throws down is to the prevailing understanding of when the climate crisis started. Most of us have accepted ... that it started with the widespread use of coal at the beginning of the Industrial Age in the 18th century and worsened with the mass adoption of oil and natural gas in the 20th.

Ghosh takes this history at least three centuries back, to the start of European colonialism in the 15th century. He [starts] the book with a 1621 massacre by Dutch invaders determined to impose a monopoly on nutmeg cultivation and trade in the Banda islands in today’s Indonesia. Not only do the Dutch systematically depopulate the islands through genocide, they also try their best to bring nutmeg cultivation into plantation mode. These are the two points to which Ghosh returns through examples from around the world. One, how European colonialists decimated not only indigenous populations but also indigenous understanding of the relationship between humans and Earth. Two, how this was an invasion not only of humans but of the Earth itself, and how this continues to the present day by looking at nature as a ‘resource’ to exploit....

We know we are facing more frequent and more severe heatwaves, storms, floods, droughts and wildfires due to climate change. We know our expansion through deforestation, dam building, canal cutting - in short, terraforming, the word Ghosh uses - has brought us repeated disasters ... Are these the responses of an angry Gaia who has finally had enough? By using the word ‘curse’ in the title, the author makes it clear that he thinks so. I use the pronoun ‘who’ knowingly, because Ghosh has quoted many non-European sources to enquire into the relationship between humans and the world around them so that he can question the prevalent way of looking at Earth as an inert object to be exploited to the maximum.

As Ghosh's text, notes and bibliography show once more, none of this is new. There have always been challenges to the way European colonialists looked at other civilisations and at Earth. It is just that the invaders and their myriad backers in the fields of economics, politics, anthropology, philosophy, literature, technology, physics, chemistry, biology have dominated global intellectual discourse....

There are other points of view that we can hear today if we listen hard enough. Those observing global climate negotiations know about the Latin American way of looking at Earth as Pachamama (Earth Mother). They also know how such a framing is just provided lip service and is ignored in the substantive portions of the negotiations. In The Nutmeg’s Curse, Ghosh explains why. He shows the extent of the vested interest in the oil economy - not only for oil-exporting countries, but also for a superpower like the US that controls oil drilling, oil prices and oil movement around the world. Many of us know power utilities are sabotaging decentralised solar power generation today because it hits their revenues and control. And how the other points of view are so often drowned out.

RC Line-wise Explanation

Paragraph 1

Original: The biggest challenge [The Nutmeg's Curse by Ghosh] throws down is to the prevailing understanding of when the climate crisis started.

Explanation: Ghosh’s book questions the commonly accepted timeline for the origin of the climate crisis.

Original: Most of us have accepted ... that it started with the widespread use of coal at the beginning of the Industrial Age in the 18th century and worsened with the mass adoption of oil and natural gas in the 20th.

Explanation: People usually believe the climate crisis began in the 1700s with industrial coal usage and became worse in the 1900s with oil and gas use.


Paragraph 2

Original: Ghosh takes this history at least three centuries back, to the start of European colonialism in the 15th century.

Explanation: Ghosh argues that the roots of the climate crisis go back to the 1400s, when European colonialism began.

Original: He [starts] the book with a 1621 massacre by Dutch invaders determined to impose a monopoly on nutmeg cultivation and trade in the Banda islands in today’s Indonesia.

Explanation: The book opens with a historical account of Dutch colonizers massacring locals in the Banda islands in 1621 to control nutmeg trade.

Original: Not only do the Dutch systematically depopulate the islands through genocide, they also try their best to bring nutmeg cultivation into plantation mode.

Explanation: The Dutch committed genocide and attempted to convert nutmeg farming into large-scale plantation agriculture.

Original: These are the two points to which Ghosh returns through examples from around the world.

Explanation: Ghosh repeats two major themes using global examples throughout the book.

Original: One, how European colonialists decimated not only indigenous populations but also indigenous understanding of the relationship between humans and Earth.

Explanation: First, colonizers destroyed both native peoples and their ecological wisdom.

Original: Two, how this was an invasion not only of humans but of the Earth itself, and how this continues to the present day by looking at nature as a ‘resource’ to exploit....

Explanation: Second, colonialism also attacked the planet itself, a mindset that persists today by treating nature as something to use and consume.


Paragraph 3

Original: We know we are facing more frequent and more severe heatwaves, storms, floods, droughts and wildfires due to climate change.

Explanation: It’s now widely acknowledged that climate change is causing more extreme weather events and disasters.

Original: We know our expansion through deforestation, dam building, canal cutting - in short, terraforming, the word Ghosh uses - has brought us repeated disasters ...

Explanation: Our actions to reshape Earth—like cutting forests and building dams—what Ghosh calls “terraforming,” have led to repeated ecological crises.

Original: Are these the responses of an angry Gaia who has finally had enough? By using the word ‘curse’ in the title, the author makes it clear that he thinks so.

Explanation: The author suggests Earth (personified as Gaia) is retaliating against human abuse, as implied by the word “curse” in the book’s title.

Original: I use the pronoun ‘who’ knowingly, because Ghosh has quoted many non-European sources to enquire into the relationship between humans and the world around them so that he can question the prevalent way of looking at Earth as an inert object to be exploited to the maximum.

Explanation: The reviewer deliberately personifies Earth, reflecting Ghosh’s approach of using non-Western views that see Earth as a living being rather than an object.


Paragraph 4

Original: As Ghosh's text, notes and bibliography show once more, none of this is new.

Explanation: Ghosh demonstrates through research that these criticisms of colonial views are not recent or original.

Original: There have always been challenges to the way European colonialists looked at other civilisations and at Earth.

Explanation: Critiques of colonial worldviews and environmental exploitation have existed all along.

Original: It is just that the invaders and their myriad backers in the fields of economics, politics, anthropology, philosophy, literature, technology, physics, chemistry, biology have dominated global intellectual discourse....

Explanation: However, those colonialist perspectives have long dominated academic and intellectual fields across disciplines.


Paragraph 5

Original: There are other points of view that we can hear today if we listen hard enough.

Explanation: Alternative worldviews still exist today, but they are often overlooked.

Original: Those observing global climate negotiations know about the Latin American way of looking at Earth as Pachamama (Earth Mother).

Explanation: For instance, Latin American cultures view Earth as a nurturing mother figure, called Pachamama.

Original: They also know how such a framing is just provided lip service and is ignored in the substantive portions of the negotiations.

Explanation: Although this view is mentioned at climate talks, it is largely dismissed in the actual policy decisions.

Original: In The Nutmeg’s Curse, Ghosh explains why.

Explanation: Ghosh addresses why these views are marginalized.

Original: He shows the extent of the vested interest in the oil economy - not only for oil-exporting countries, but also for a superpower like the US that controls oil drilling, oil prices and oil movement around the world.

Explanation: He reveals that powerful stakeholders—especially countries like the U.S.—have too much to gain from oil to take alternative views seriously.

Original: Many of us know power utilities are sabotaging decentralised solar power generation today because it hits their revenues and control.

Explanation: Even now, utility companies oppose solar power because it threatens their profits and authority.

Original: And how the other points of view are so often drowned out.

Explanation: As a result, alternative voices and solutions are frequently silenced or ignored.

RC Paragraph Explanation

Paragraph 1 Summary

Ghosh challenges the popular belief that the climate crisis began with industrialization, arguing instead that its roots lie in 15th-century European colonialism.


Paragraph 2 Summary

Using the Dutch massacre in the Banda Islands as a starting point, Ghosh highlights how colonialism not only destroyed people but also indigenous environmental philosophies, promoting exploitative attitudes toward Earth that continue today.


Paragraph 3 Summary

Ghosh connects current climate disasters to humanity’s long history of reshaping Earth, suggesting that nature may be retaliating, and he draws on global traditions that view Earth as a living being, not an inert object.


Paragraph 4 Summary

The book emphasizes that critiques of colonial attitudes toward Earth have long existed but have been overshadowed by dominant Western intellectual frameworks.


Paragraph 5 Summary

Alternative worldviews, like those recognizing Earth as Pachamama, are often sidelined due to powerful interests in the oil economy and resistance from existing energy systems, as Ghosh compellingly illustrates.

RC Quick Table Summary
Paragraph NumberMain Idea
Paragraph 1Ghosh traces the climate crisis back to European colonialism, not industrialization.
Paragraph 2Colonialism destroyed both native people and their ecological wisdom.
Paragraph 3Ghosh views today’s climate chaos as Earth’s revenge against human exploitation.
Paragraph 4Historical critiques of colonialism exist but have been drowned out by dominant ideologies.
Paragraph 5Powerful interests suppress alternative, Earth-friendly perspectives in global policy.

RC Questions

Ques 13. Which one of the following best explains the primary purpose of the discussion of the colonisation of the Banda islands in “The Nutmeg’s Curse”?

Correct Answer: (D) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: The passage discusses the colonization of the Banda islands to highlight how colonialism led to a mindset that treated nature as a resource for exploitation. This mindset is argued to have played a significant role in the processes that ultimately contributed to climate change.- Option A is too narrow, as the focus is not just on violence against people but on a broader exploitative worldview. - Option B only partially aligns, as the passage does not specifically focus on the role of crop cultivation in climate change. - Option C is incorrect, as the passage does not imply that the climate crisis started with the Banda islands’ colonization.Thus, Option D is the best choice, as it accurately captures the passage's focus on the colonial mindset's role in shaping attitudes toward nature.

Ques 14. Which one of the following, if true, would make the reviewer’s choice of the pronoun “who” for Gaia inappropriate?

Correct Answer: (B) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: The passage uses the pronoun "who" for Gaia, suggesting that the Earth is personified as a sentient being, especially in non-European cultural perspectives. If it were true that non-European societies viewed the Earth as a non-living resource, this would contradict the justification for using “who” to personify Gaia.- Option A would not affect the appropriateness of "who" because it doesn’t address the perception of the Earth as a living entity. - Option C would not affect the reviewer’s choice of “who” for Gaia, as scientific evidence of Earth’s inanimateness does not directly counter cultural views. - Option D is irrelevant, as a change in the book's title does not affect the personification of Gaia.Thus, Option B is the correct answer, as it directly challenges the use of "who" by undermining the idea of the Earth as a sentient entity in non-European views.

Ques 15. All of the following can be inferred from the reviewer's discussion of “The Nutmeg’s Curse”, EXCEPT:

Correct Answer: (C) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: The passage suggests that dominant academic discourses have traditionally supported colonialist and exploitative perspectives, rather than focusing on environmental preservation. This means that academic discourse has not always raised awareness about environmental protection.- Option A is supported by the passage, which connects colonialism with the history of climate change. - Option B can be inferred from the discussion on the non-European perspectives on Earth that could inform environmental preservation policies. - Option D is supported by the statement that colonial processes established the dominant view of nature.Therefore, Option C is the correct answer, as it contradicts the passage’s depiction of academic discourses.

Ques 16. On the basis of information in the passage, which one of the following is NOT a reason for the failure of policies seeking to address climate change?

Correct Answer: (C) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: The passage mentions that power utilities oppose decentralized solar power because it impacts their revenues and control, but it does not suggest that decentralization itself is a reason for climate policy failures. Instead, it implies that the vested interests of centralized power utilities obstruct the adoption of renewable energy.- Option A is relevant, as the passage mentions the marginalization of non-European perspectives. - Option B is relevant, as the passage discusses the greed of organizations benefitting from fossil fuels. - Option D is relevant, as the passage highlights the global dominance of oil economies.Thus, Option C is the correct answer, as decentralization of renewable energy is not itself a reason for policy failure according to the passage.

Actual CAT VA-RC 2023 Slot 3: Question-wise Index

Reading ComprehensionWords from the Passage
RC Passage 1 (Q 1 to 4) Must-Learn Words (Passage 1)
RC Passage 2 (Q 5 to 8) Must-Learn Words (Passage 2)
RC Passage 3 (Q 9 to 12) Must-Learn Words (Passage 3)
RC Passage 4 (Q 13 to 16) Must-Learn Words (Passage 4)
Verbal Ability
Ques 17 (Para-Completion) Ques 18 (Para-Completion)
Ques 19 (Misfit/Odd one out) Ques 20 (Misfit/Odd one out)
Ques 21 (Para-jumble) Ques 22 (Para-jumble)
Ques 23 (Paragraph Summary) Ques 24 (Paragraph Summary)
×

Get 1 Free Counselling


Free Counselling
Call Icon