📘 What’s Inside This CAT RC Practice Post?

📝 Authentic CAT Reading Comprehension Passage: Practice with a real RC passage from a previous CAT exam.
✅ Detailed Questions with Step-by-Step Solutions: Each question is explained thoroughly for better understanding.
đŸŽ„ Video Solutions by Prashant Sir: Watch detailed video solutions for quicker concept clarity.
đŸŽ„ Passage Analysis Video by Prashant Sir: Understand the passage deeply with a full line-by-line and paragraph analysis.
🔍 In-Depth Passage Analysis: Gain insights through line-by-line and paragraph-wise analysis, supplemented with a quick summary table for efficient revision.
📚 Vocabulary Enhancement: Get a separate post explaining all tough words from the passage.



RC Passage

Direction for the questions 10 to 14: The passage below is accompanied by a set of five questions. Choose the best answer to each question.

More and more companies, government agencies, educational institutions and philanthropic organizations are today in the grip of a new phenomenon: ‘metric fixation’. The key components of metric fixation are the belief that it is possible – and desirable – to replace professional judgment (acquired through personal experience and talent) with numerical indicators of comparative performance based upon standardised data (metrics); and that the best way to motivate people within these organisations is by attaching rewards and penalties to their measured performance.

The rewards can be monetary, in the form of pay for performance, say, or reputational, in the form of college rankings, hospital ratings, surgical report cards and so on. But the most dramatic negative effect of metric fixation is its propensity to incentivise gaming: that is, encouraging professionals to maximise the metrics in ways that are at odds with the larger purpose of the organisation. If the rate of major crimes in a district becomes the metric according to which police officers are promoted, then some officers will respond by simply not recording crimes or downgrading them from major offences to misdemeanours. Or take the case of surgeons. When the metrics of success and failure are made public – affecting their reputation and income – some surgeons will improve their metric scores by refusing to operate on patients with more complex problems, whose surgical outcomes are more likely to be negative. Who suffers? The patients who don’t get operated upon.

When reward is tied to measured performance, metric fixation invites just this sort of gaming. But metric fixation also leads to a variety of more subtle unintended negative consequences. These include goal displacement, which comes in many varieties: when performance is judged by a few measures, and the stakes are high (keeping one’s job, getting a pay rise or raising the stock price at the time that stock options are vested), people focus on satisfying those measures – often at the expense of other, more important organisational goals that are not measured. The best-known example is ‘teaching to the test’, a widespread phenomenon that has distorted primary and secondary education in the United States since the adoption of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

Short-termism is another negative. Measured performance encourages what the US sociologist Robert K Merton in 1936 called ‘the imperious immediacy of interests where the actor’s paramount concern with the foreseen immediate consequences excludes consideration of further or other consequences’. In short, advancing short-term goals at the expense of long-range considerations. This problem is endemic to publicly traded corporations that sacrifice long-term research and development, and the development of their staff, to the perceived imperatives of the quarterly report.

To the debit side of the ledger must also be added the transactional costs of metrics: the expenditure of employee time by those tasked with compiling and processing the metrics in the first place – not to mention the time required to actually read them.

Full RC Video Analysis
RC Line-wise Explanation

Paragraph 1

"More and more companies, government agencies, educational institutions and philanthropic organizations are today in the grip of a new phenomenon: ‘metric fixation’."

Explanation: Increasingly, organizations like companies, government bodies, schools, and charities are becoming obsessed with the use of metrics.

"The key components of metric fixation are the belief that it is possible – and desirable – to replace professional judgment (acquired through personal experience and talent) with numerical indicators of comparative performance based upon standardised data (metrics);"

Explanation: Metric fixation involves the belief that it is both possible and beneficial to replace professional judgment, gained through experience and skills, with numerical performance indicators based on standardized data.

"and that the best way to motivate people within these organisations is by attaching rewards and penalties to their measured performance."

Explanation: The idea is that the best way to motivate individuals within these organizations is by offering rewards or penalties based on how well they perform according to these metrics.


Paragraph 2

"The rewards can be monetary, in the form of pay for performance, say, or reputational, in the form of college rankings, hospital ratings, surgical report cards and so on."

Explanation: Rewards can be monetary, like pay-for-performance schemes, or reputational, such as rankings for colleges, hospitals, or surgeons.

"But the most dramatic negative effect of metric fixation is its propensity to incentivise gaming: that is, encouraging professionals to maximise the metrics in ways that are at odds with the larger purpose of the organisation."

Explanation: The most harmful effect of metric fixation is that it leads to "gaming" – professionals manipulating the metrics in ways that conflict with the organization’s overall purpose.

"If the rate of major crimes in a district becomes the metric according to which police officers are promoted, then some officers will respond by simply not recording crimes or downgrading them from major offences to misdemeanours."

Explanation: For example, if police promotions depend on the crime rate, some officers may manipulate the numbers by not recording crimes or reclassifying serious crimes as minor ones.

"Or take the case of surgeons. When the metrics of success and failure are made public – affecting their reputation and income – some surgeons will improve their metric scores by refusing to operate on patients with more complex problems, whose surgical outcomes are more likely to be negative."

Explanation: Similarly, surgeons may avoid operating on complex cases with a higher chance of failure to improve their success rates, which affects their reputation and income.

"Who suffers? The patients who don’t get operated upon."

Explanation: The victims of this manipulation are the patients who are denied necessary surgeries.


Paragraph 3

"When reward is tied to measured performance, metric fixation invites just this sort of gaming."

Explanation: When rewards are based on metrics, it encourages this kind of manipulation or "gaming" of the system.

"But metric fixation also leads to a variety of more subtle unintended negative consequences."

Explanation: Apart from gaming, metric fixation also causes more subtle and unintended negative effects.

"These include goal displacement, which comes in many varieties: when performance is judged by a few measures, and the stakes are high (keeping one’s job, getting a pay rise or raising the stock price at the time that stock options are vested), people focus on satisfying those measures – often at the expense of other, more important organisational goals that are not measured."

Explanation: One such negative effect is "goal displacement," where people focus on the few measured metrics that affect their job or rewards, neglecting other more important goals that aren’t measured.

"The best-known example is ‘teaching to the test’, a widespread phenomenon that has distorted primary and secondary education in the United States since the adoption of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001."

Explanation: A common example of goal displacement is "teaching to the test," which has skewed education in the U.S. since the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.


Paragraph 4

"Short-termism is another negative."

Explanation: Short-termism is another harmful consequence of metric fixation.

"Measured performance encourages what the US sociologist Robert K Merton in 1936 called ‘the imperious immediacy of interests where the actor’s paramount concern with the foreseen immediate consequences excludes consideration of further or other consequences’."

Explanation: Metric fixation encourages a short-term focus, where individuals prioritize immediate results over long-term consequences, as described by sociologist Robert K. Merton.

"In short, advancing short-term goals at the expense of long-range considerations."

Explanation: In essence, short-term goals are prioritized over long-term planning.

"This problem is endemic to publicly traded corporations that sacrifice long-term research and development, and the development of their staff, to the perceived imperatives of the quarterly report."

Explanation: This issue is common in publicly traded companies, where short-term profits (often shown in quarterly reports) are prioritized over long-term investments like research, development, and employee growth.


Paragraph 5

"To the debit side of the ledger must also be added the transactional costs of metrics: the expenditure of employee time by those tasked with compiling and processing the metrics in the first place – not to mention the time required to actually read them."

Explanation: Another cost of metric fixation is the time spent by employees in collecting, processing, and reading metrics, which is a drain on resources.

RC Paragraph Explanation

Paragraph 1 Summary

Metric fixation refers to the growing belief that professional judgment should be replaced by standardized metrics, and that rewards or penalties should be tied to these metrics to motivate employees within organizations.


Paragraph 2 Summary

While rewards based on metrics can be monetary or reputational, a major negative impact of metric fixation is that it incentivizes "gaming" – professionals manipulating the metrics in ways that harm the organization’s overall purpose.


Paragraph 3 Summary

In addition to gaming, metric fixation leads to unintended consequences such as goal displacement, where people focus on satisfying measurable metrics at the expense of other, more important organizational goals. "Teaching to the test" is a prime example of this.


Paragraph 4 Summary

Another negative effect of metric fixation is short-termism, where individuals focus on immediate results and ignore long-term consequences. This is particularly problematic in publicly traded companies that prioritize short-term profits over long-term investments.


Paragraph 5 Summary

Metric fixation also involves significant transactional costs, including the time employees spend collecting, processing, and reading metrics, which can drain organizational resources.

RC Quick Table Summary
Paragraph NumberMain Idea
Paragraph 1Metric fixation is the belief that professional judgment can be replaced by standardized metrics, with rewards tied to performance.
Paragraph 2A major drawback of metric fixation is that it leads to "gaming," where professionals manipulate metrics in ways that undermine the organization’s goals.
Paragraph 3Metric fixation leads to unintended negative effects like goal displacement, where employees focus on measurable goals at the expense of other important objectives.
Paragraph 4Short-termism is another negative consequence of metric fixation, where immediate goals are prioritized over long-term considerations.
Paragraph 5The transactional costs of metric fixation include the time spent by employees on collecting, processing, and reading metrics, which drains resources.

RC Questions

Ques 10. What main point does the author want to convey through the examples of the police officer and the surgeon?

Correct Answer: (B) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: Option A does not convey the message that the author has expressed while giving the examples of police officers and surgeons. Hence, we can eliminate it. Option C is a neutral and general statement, and does not capture the essence of the passage either. Option D can be considered as a conclusion to the whole passage, but it does not specify about the possible unethical behaviour due to metric fixation. The author mentions in the second paragraph that metric fixation can have negative effects by encouraging unethical behaviour in professionals. The passage directly explains how police officers and surgeons may get tempted to avoid their duties, if their jobs start depending on metric scores. Hence, Option B is the correct answer.

Ques 11. Which of the following is NOT a consequence of the 'metric fixation' phenomenon mentioned in the passage?

Correct Answer: (B) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: Option B can be eliminated as the author states in the fourth paragraph that, “In short, advancing short-term goals at the expense of long-range considerations”. Option C has also been discussed as one of the consequences of metric fixation (gaming). Option D can also be eliminated as the examples of police officers and surgeons imply that some professionals might use unethical methods to maximise their metrics even if they go against the larger purpose. The author states nowhere in the passage that employee co-operation might improve. Hence, Option A is the correct answer.

Ques 12. Of the following, which would have added the least depth to the author’s argument?

Correct Answer: (B) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: This question is quite tricky and needs careful analysis and elimination of incorrect options one by one. Also, the one thing that you need to spot in this question is the usage of the word ‘least’ in the given case. Three out of the four options given here will add depth to the author’s argument and one option will not. We need to find that one option that does not add depth. Any option that adds new information to the author’s argument will be preferred here and the option that does not shed any new light will be the odd one out. Option A suggests an analysis and will provide us with greater details and add value to the author’s argument. Option C suggests a comparative study with respect to the main goals of an organization. This will tell us which approach to follow; this is again something that adds value. Option D talks about presenting the positive side and negative side of judgment-based evaluation system – this again will help us identifying whether we should us this approach or not. Option B suggests presenting more examples where professionals have tricked the system. The author has already provided example of this in the passage and this does not any new to the author’s argument. Hence, Option B is the correct answer.

Ques 13. All of the following can be a possible feature of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, EXCEPT:

Correct Answer: (D) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: The term ‘teaching to the test’ implies that there would be an immense stress on students to score well, and teaching has seen a shift towards just scoring well from the point of view of tests. The ‘distortion’ mentioned by the author could be the lack of an overall growth and holistic education that a child needs at school. Options A, B, and C stress on the test scores (metric-based evaluation) while describing the possible impacts or significance of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Whereas Option D suggests that student assessment is dependent on the teacher’s evaluation – which does not fit the ‘distortion’ implied by the phrase ‘teaching to the test’. Hence, Option D is the correct answer.

Ques 14. What is the main idea that the author is trying to highlight in the passage?t

Correct Answer: (D) The author’s main idea is to point out the demerits of the metric-based evaluation, by citing examples and negative impact on the integrity of various professions. Option A does not highlight this, hence it I can be eliminated. Option B focuses only on one of the impacts - short-termism. There are a few more ill-effects of metric fixation. As this option does not encapsulate the overall message of the passage, we can eliminate it too. Option C has not been supported at all by the author, hence ruling this out as well. Option D captures the overall conclusion after the evaluation of all the arguments presented in the passage. Hence, it is the correct option.

Actual CAT VA-RC 2018 Slot 2: Question-wise Index

Reading ComprehensionWords from the Passage
RC Passage 1 (Q 1 to 5) Must-Learn Words (Passage 1)
RC Passage 2 (Q 6 to 9) Must-Learn Words (Passage 2)
RC Passage 3 (Q 10 to 14) Must-Learn Words (Passage 3)
RC Passage 4 (Q 15 to 19) Must-Learn Words (Passage 4)
RC Passage 5 (Q 20 to 24) Must-Learn Words (Passage 5)
Verbal Ability
Ques 25 (Paragraph Summary) Ques 26 (Para-jumble)
Ques 27 (Para-jumble) Ques 28 (Para-jumble)
Ques 29 (Para-jumble) Ques 30 (Misfit/Odd one out)
Ques 31 (Misfit/Odd one out) Ques 32 (Paragraph Summary)
Ques 33 (Paragraph Summary) Ques 34 (Paragraph Summary)
Free Counselling
Call Icon
×

Get 1 Free Counselling