📘 What’s Inside This CAT RC Practice Post?

📝 Authentic CAT Reading Comprehension Passage: Practice with a real RC passage from a previous CAT exam.
✅ Detailed Questions with Step-by-Step Solutions: Each question is explained thoroughly for better understanding.
🔍 In-Depth Passage Analysis: Gain insights through line-by-line and paragraph-wise analysis, supplemented with a quick summary table for efficient revision.
📚 Vocabulary Enhancement: Get a separate post explaining all tough words from the passage.



RC Passage

Direction for the questions 9 to 12: The passage below is accompanied by a set of six questions. Choose the best answer to each question.

RESIDENTS of Lozère, a hilly department in southern France, recite complaints familiar to many rural corners of Europe. In remote hamlets and villages, with names such as Le Bacon and Le Bacon Vieux, mayors grumble about a lack of local schools, jobs, or phone and internet connections. Farmers of grazing animals add another concern: the return of wolves. Eradicated from France last century, the predators are gradually creeping back to more forests and hillsides. “The wolf must be taken in hand,” said an aspiring parliamentarian, Francis Palombi, when pressed by voters in an election campaign early this summer. Tourists enjoy visiting a wolf park in Lozère, but farmers fret over their livestock and their livelihoods. . . .

As early as the ninth century, the royal office of the Luparii—wolf-catchers—was created in France to tackle the predators. Those official hunters (and others) completed their job in the 1930s, when the last wolf disappeared from the mainland. Active hunting and improved technology such as rifles in the 19th century, plus the use of poison such as strychnine later on, caused the population collapse. But in the early 1990s the animals reappeared. They crossed the Alps from Italy, upsetting sheep farmers on the French side of the border. Wolves have since spread to areas such as Lozère, delighting environmentalists, who see the predators’ presence as a sign of wider ecological health. Farmers, who say the wolves cause the deaths of thousands of sheep and other grazing animals, are less cheerful. They grumble that green activists and politically correct urban types have allowed the return of an old enemy.

Various factors explain

the changes of the past few decades. Rural depopulation is part of the story. In Lozère, for example, farming and a once-flourishing mining industry supported a population of over 140,000 residents in the mid-19th century. Today the department has fewer than 80,000 people, many in its towns. As humans withdraw, forests are expanding. In France, between 1990 and 2015, forest cover increased by an average of 102,000 hectares each year, as more fields were given over to trees. Now, nearly one-third of mainland France is covered by woodland of some sort. The decline of hunting as a sport also means more forests fall quiet. In the mid-to-late 20th century over 2m hunters regularly spent winter weekends tramping in woodland, seeking boars, birds and other prey. Today the Fédération Nationale des Chasseurs, the national body, claims 1.1m people hold hunting licences, though the number of active hunters is probably lower. The mostly protected status of the wolf in Europe—hunting them is now forbidden, other than when occasional culls are sanctioned by the state—plus the efforts of NGOs to track and count the animals, also contribute to the recovery of wolf populations.

As the lupine population of Europe spreads westwards, with occasional reports of wolves seen closer to urban areas, expect to hear of more clashes between farmers and those who celebrate the predators’ return. Farmers’ losses are real, but are not the only economic story. Tourist venues, such as parks where wolves are kept and the animals’ spread is discussed, also generate income and jobs in rural areas.

RC Line-wise Explanation

Paragraph 1

Original: RESIDENTS of Lozère, a hilly department in southern France, recite complaints familiar to many rural corners of Europe.

Explanation: People living in Lozère, a mountainous area in France, have concerns similar to those in other rural European areas.

Original: In remote hamlets and villages, with names such as Le Bacon and Le Bacon Vieux, mayors grumble about a lack of local schools, jobs, or phone and internet connections.

Explanation: In small villages, local leaders complain about insufficient public services like education, employment, and digital connectivity.

Original: Farmers of grazing animals add another concern: the return of wolves.

Explanation: Animal farmers are additionally worried about wolves coming back to the area.

Original: Eradicated from France last century, the predators are gradually creeping back to more forests and hillsides.

Explanation: Though wolves were wiped out in France in the 20th century, they are now slowly returning to rural and forested regions.

Original: ‘The wolf must be taken in hand,’ said an aspiring parliamentarian, Francis Palombi, when pressed by voters in an election campaign early this summer.

Explanation: A political candidate, Francis Palombi, emphasized controlling the wolf problem during a campaign when voters brought it up.

Original: Tourists enjoy visiting a wolf park in Lozère, but farmers fret over their livestock and their livelihoods.

Explanation: While tourists like seeing wolves in parks, farmers are worried the animals threaten their animals and income.


Paragraph 2

Original: As early as the ninth century, the royal office of the Luparii—wolf-catchers—was created in France to tackle the predators.

Explanation: France had an official position called the Luparii for hunting wolves as far back as the 800s.

Original: Those official hunters (and others) completed their job in the 1930s, when the last wolf disappeared from the mainland.

Explanation: These hunters succeeded in eradicating wolves in mainland France by the 1930s.

Original: Active hunting and improved technology such as rifles in the 19th century, plus the use of poison such as strychnine later on, caused the population collapse.

Explanation: Advances in weapons and the use of poisons led to the near extinction of wolves.

Original: But in the early 1990s the animals reappeared.

Explanation: Wolves began returning in the 1990s.

Original: They crossed the Alps from Italy, upsetting sheep farmers on the French side of the border.

Explanation: Wolves migrated from Italy over the Alps, alarming French sheep farmers.

Original: Wolves have since spread to areas such as Lozère, delighting environmentalists, who see the predators’ presence as a sign of wider ecological health.

Explanation: Conservationists welcome the wolves, viewing them as indicators of a healthy environment.

Original: Farmers, who say the wolves cause the deaths of thousands of sheep and other grazing animals, are less cheerful.

Explanation: Farmers are upset, saying wolves kill many of their livestock.

Original: They grumble that green activists and politically correct urban types have allowed the return of an old enemy.

Explanation: They blame environmentalists and city dwellers for supporting the wolves' return without understanding the rural impact.


Paragraph 3

Original: Various factors explain the changes of the past few decades. Rural depopulation is part of the story.

Explanation: Several reasons contribute to the return of wolves, including fewer people living in rural areas.

Original: In Lozère, for example, farming and a once-flourishing mining industry supported a population of over 140,000 residents in the mid-19th century.

Explanation: In the 1800s, Lozère had a large population supported by farming and mining.

Original: Today the department has fewer than 80,000 people, many in its towns.

Explanation: Now, Lozère’s population has halved, with more people living in towns than villages.

Original: As humans withdraw, forests are expanding.

Explanation: With fewer people and farms, forests are growing back.

Original: In France, between 1990 and 2015, forest cover increased by an average of 102,000 hectares each year, as more fields were given over to trees.

Explanation: During this period, trees replaced farmlands at a rapid rate.

Original: Now, nearly one-third of mainland France is covered by woodland of some sort.

Explanation: Currently, forests occupy a significant portion of French land.

Original: The decline of hunting as a sport also means more forests fall quiet.

Explanation: As fewer people hunt for sport, forests have become quieter and more animal-friendly.

Original: In the mid-to-late 20th century over 2m hunters regularly spent winter weekends tramping in woodland, seeking boars, birds and other prey.

Explanation: Decades ago, hunting was popular and kept wildlife in check.

Original: Today the FĂŠdĂŠration Nationale des Chasseurs, the national body, claims 1.1m people hold hunting licences, though the number of active hunters is probably lower.

Explanation: Though many still hold hunting permits, fewer people are actively hunting now.

Original: The mostly protected status of the wolf in Europe—hunting them is now forbidden, other than when occasional culls are sanctioned by the state—plus the efforts of NGOs to track and count the animals, also contribute to the recovery of wolf populations.

Explanation: Wolves are now legally protected, and conservation groups help monitor them, aiding their resurgence.


Paragraph 4

Original: As the lupine population of Europe spreads westwards, with occasional reports of wolves seen closer to urban areas, expect to hear of more clashes between farmers and those who celebrate the predators’ return.

Explanation: As wolves move closer to cities, tensions between farmers and environmentalists are likely to grow.

Original: Farmers’ losses are real, but are not the only economic story.

Explanation: Though farmers suffer, there's another side to the story economically.

Original: Tourist venues, such as parks where wolves are kept and the animals’ spread is discussed, also generate income and jobs in rural areas.

Explanation: Wolves also bring tourism, creating jobs and revenue for rural communities.

RC Paragraph Explanation

Paragraph 1 Summary

Residents of Lozère express typical rural concerns, especially over the return of wolves that threaten livestock, despite tourist interest in the animals.


Paragraph 2 Summary

Wolves were eradicated in France by the 1930s but reappeared in the 1990s from Italy. Their return pleases environmentalists but worries farmers, who see them as a renewed threat.


Paragraph 3 Summary

Rural depopulation, forest regrowth, and declining hunting have created an environment favorable for wolves. Legal protections and conservation efforts have also supported their return.


Paragraph 4 Summary

As wolves move westward and near cities, conflicts between supporters and detractors increase. While farmers suffer losses, wolf-related tourism offers new rural economic opportunities.

RC Quick Table Summary
Paragraph NumberMain Idea
Paragraph 1Rural Lozère worries about services and the threat wolves pose to livestock.
Paragraph 2Wolves, once extinct in France, have returned and caused conflict between farmers and greens.
Paragraph 3Depopulation, reforestation, and conservation laws have aided the wolf’s return.
Paragraph 4Wolf-related tensions continue, but tourism also brings benefits to rural areas.

RC Questions

Ques 9. The inhabitants of Lozère have to grapple with all of the following problems, EXCEPT:

Correct Answer: (C) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: The passage describes various issues faced by Lozère residents, such as livestock losses from wolf attacks, lack of schools, jobs, and communication infrastructure (such as phone and internet). However, the decline in hunting licenses is mentioned not as a problem directly affecting residents but rather as a factor in the expanding wolf population due to quieter forests.- Option A (livestock losses) is correct, as it affects farmers directly due to wolf attacks. - Option B (lack of educational facilities) is mentioned as a complaint from mayors. - Option D (poor rural communication infrastructure) is also highlighted as an issue faced by residents.Thus, Option C does not directly relate to a concern of Lozère’s residents, making it the correct answer.

Ques 10. Which one of the following statements, if true, would weaken the author’s claims?

Correct Answer: (B) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: The author suggests that the return of wolves can have economic benefits by attracting tourists, who enjoy visiting wolf parks and learning about the animals. If wolf attacks on tourists were on the rise, it would discourage tourism and weaken the author’s claim about the economic benefit brought by wolves.- Option A (mining sites used as grazing pastures) would not weaken the author’s claims about the issues discussed. - Option C (wolves returning to Lozère) supports the author's description of wolves' resurgence, so it would not weaken the claim. - Option D (unemployment concerns) aligns with the residents’ complaints about lack of jobs but does not challenge the claims about wolves' impact.Thus, Option B would weaken the author’s argument by undermining the perceived economic benefit of wolf-related tourism.

Ques 11. Which one of the following has NOT contributed to the growing wolf population in Lozère?

Correct Answer: (C) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: The passage provides several factors contributing to the resurgence of the wolf population, including protected status, rural depopulation leading to forest expansion, and the reduction in hunting. The shutting down of the royal office of the Luparii, which historically handled wolf control, is not mentioned as a factor affecting the recent wolf population.- Option A (protected status of wolves) contributes to their resurgence by limiting hunting. - Option B (decline in rural population) has allowed forests to expand, which supports wolf habitats. - Option D (increase in forest cover) provides suitable habitat, contributing to the wolves’ return.Since Option C does not relate to recent changes, it is the correct answer.

Ques 12. The author presents a possible economic solution to an existing issue facing Lozère that takes into account the divergent and competing interests of:

Correct Answer: (D) Detailed explanation by Wordpandit: The passage mentions that the return of wolves, while challenging for farmers, creates economic opportunities through tourism, such as wolf parks. This solution considers the interests of environmentalists, who value the wolves' return as a sign of ecological health, and farmers, who suffer livestock losses but may benefit economically from increased tourism.- Option A (politicians and farmers) is not discussed as having competing interests in the context of an economic solution. - Option B (tourists and environmentalists) does not directly capture the economic solution presented. - Option C (environmentalists and politicians) is not relevant to the described solution.Option D best reflects the competing interests of farmers and environmentalists, making it the correct answer.

Actual CAT VA-RC 2023 Slot 1: Question-wise Index

Reading ComprehensionWords from the Passage
RC Passage 1 (Q 1 to 4) Must-Learn Words (Passage 1)
RC Passage 2 (Q 5 to 8) Must-Learn Words (Passage 2)
RC Passage 3 (Q 9 to 12) Must-Learn Words (Passage 3)
RC Passage 4 (Q 13 to 16) Must-Learn Words (Passage 4)
Verbal Ability
Ques 17 (Para-Completion) Ques 18 (Para-Completion)
Ques 19 (Misfit/Odd one out) Ques 20 (Misfit/Odd one out)
Ques 21 (Para-jumble) Ques 22 (Para-jumble)
Ques 23 (Paragraph Summary) Ques 24 (Paragraph Summary)
Free Counselling
Call Icon
×

Get 1 Free Counselling